This site is entirely user-supported. See how you can help.
We don't have any photos of this monument yet. Why don't you be the first to send us one?
If Google Street View is available, the image is from the best available vantage point looking, if possible, towards the location of the monument. Where it is not available, the satellite view is shown instead.
Latitude: 52.4404 / 52°26'25"N
Longitude: -4.0127 / 4°0'45"W
OS Eastings: 263286
OS Northings: 284393
OS Grid: SN632843
Mapcode National: GBR 8V.MBNP
Mapcode Global: VH4F6.DXHL
Entry Name: Hen Gaer Hilltop Enclosure
Source ID: 1834
Cadw Legacy ID: CD026
Schedule Class: Defence
Traditional County: Cardiganshire
The monument comprises the well preserved remains of a hillfort, consisting of single bank and ditch, which probably dates to the Iron Age period (c. 800 BC - AD 74, the Roman conquest of Wales). Hillforts are usually located on hilltops and surrounded by a single or multiple earthworks of massive proportions. Hillforts must have formed symbols of power within the landscape, while their function may have had as much to do with ostentation and display as defence. Hen Gaer occupies the highest point of a rounded hill at 120m above sea level. It is strongly defended by a single bank and ditch up to 12m wide and 3m-4m high overall. The original entrance on the west side is a simple gap but with a large mound outside which may have formed part of the entrance defences. There are more recent gaps at the north and south. The interior is oval, measuring c.140m by 75m, with traces of later ridge and furrow cultivation visible on aerial photographs; an old field bank runs from north to south a short distance inside the western bank. Earlier sources reported the presence of two hut circles but these are no longer readily apparent. The monument is of national importance for its potential to enhance our knowledge of later prehistoric defensive organisation and settlement. The site forms an important element within the wider later prehistoric context and within the surrounding landscape. The site is well preserved and retains considerable archaeological potential. There is a strong probability of the presence of evidence relating to chronology, building techniques and functional detail.
The scheduled area comprises the remains described and areas around them within which related evidence may be expected to survive.
Other nearby scheduled monuments