Ancient Monuments

History on the Ground

This site is entirely user-supported. See how you can help.

Burton medieval village, associated open field system, fishpond and moated fishpond complex, and early post-medieval village and associated field system

A Scheduled Monument in Warcop, Cumbria

Approximate Location Map
Large Map »
Street or Overhead View
Contributor Photos »

If Google Street View is available, the image is from the best available vantage point looking, if possible, towards the location of the monument. Where it is not available, the satellite view is shown instead.

Coordinates

Latitude: 54.5621 / 54°33'43"N

Longitude: -2.3973 / 2°23'50"W

OS Eastings: 374406.409937

OS Northings: 518617.274951

OS Grid: NY744186

Mapcode National: GBR CHPP.SC

Mapcode Global: WH931.4LPG

Entry Name: Burton medieval village, associated open field system, fishpond and moated fishpond complex, and early post-medieval village and associated field system

Scheduled Date: 29 October 1999

Source: Historic England

Source ID: 1018825

English Heritage Legacy ID: 27835

County: Cumbria

Civil Parish: Warcop

Traditional County: Westmorland

Lieutenancy Area (Ceremonial County): Cumbria

Church of England Parish: Warcop St Columba

Church of England Diocese: Carlisle

Details

The monument includes the earthworks and buried remains of Burton medieval
village, its associated medieval open field system, a fishpond and a medieval
moated fishpond complex, as well as the early post-medieval settlement of
Burton and part of its associated field system, which developed within the
boundaries of the medieval settlement as the area of the earlier settlement
shrank. It is located at the foot of Roman Fell on opposing sides of a shallow
valley at the confluence of three minor streams, of which Cringle Beck is the
only one named. Although the date of the first settlement at Burton is unknown
documentary sources indicate an early family named Burton were lords of the
manor of Burton at some time prior to 1283. From 1283 until the early 18th
century the de Helton or Hilton family were lords of the manor. Burton
remained occupied until 1949 when the land was sold to the Ministry of
Defence, after which time all the buildings were gradually destroyed as the
army made use of them in training exercises.
The plan of the medieval village is of a type familiar to this part of Cumbria
in which two parallel lines of houses face onto a village green and central
street, with crofts, or garden areas, to the rear. Behind the crofts were
narrow back lanes beyond which were the open fields where crops were grown. At
the western end of the village green lies the moated fishpond complex,
although this is considered to have originally been the site of the earliest
medieval manor house at Burton, thus giving the medieval village a highly
regular layout with its apparently planned system of tofts and streets
suggestive of an ordered tenurial structure, with a manorial overship.
Where not covered by now demolished post-medieval buildings or disturbed by
military activity, earthwork remains of the medieval village consisting of
abandoned tofts, that is house plots, and their associated yards and crofts
survive at the south eastern end of the monument together with the back lanes
at the rear of the crofts, although the northern back lane is now utilised by
a modern track. During the 15th century the moated manor house is considered
to have been abandoned and a new manor house built towards the eastern end of
the village on a site later occupied by the post-medieval Burton Hall.
Immediately north of the site of the new manor house is a sub-rectangular
enclosure with boundaries formed by a scarp up to 2.5m high. This enclosure is
considered to have been associated with the rebuilt manor house and may have
functioned as a paddock or orchard. This phenomenon of the `moving manor
house' is well-documented elsewhere in England during the 15th century, as a
long period of economic stagnation and disruption caused by a combination of
border warfare, bubonic plagues and cattle plagues led to the abandonment or
shrinkage of many farmsteads and villages. At an unspecified date after the
abandonment of the original manor house the platform of the moated site was
remodelled and four rectangular fishponds were constructed, through which
water was channelled via underground pipes, a small leat and sluice gates.
This arrangement of fishponds provided a regular food source and is considered
to have complemented or replaced an earlier fishpond located a short distance
to the north and which is marked on present day maps as a disused reservoir.
On all sides of the moat except the south east there are the earthworks of the
associated medieval open field system. The most prominent earthworks occupy
the hillside to the north east of the moat and consist of broad ridge and
furrow aligned north east - south west interspersed by three lynchets. On the
northern side of the moat there is an area of narrow ridge and furrow
considered to be an attempt to improve a poorly drained patch of land. These
ridges respect field banks to the west and south and are therefore
contemporary with these boundaries or post-date them. Two other blocks of
ridge and furrow are situated north west and west of the moat, that south of
the single fishpond has straight and parallel ridges 4m wide, while that to
the west of the moat has broader ridges which are more curved and uneven. A
considerably mutilated area of ridge and furrow lies immediately south of the
moat; the ridges average 7.5m wide and are gently curving. An earthwork
headland or turning point for the oxen-drawn medieval ploughing team adjacent
to the moat suggests that the ridge and furrow here post-dates the moated
site.
Maps of 17th, 18th and 19th century date indicate that post-medieval Burton
consisted of Burton Hall - which was built on the same site as the second
medieval manor house and incorporated some of the features of this earlier
building, Burton Farm Homestead, also known as The White House, which lay to
the south west of Burton Hall, and a cottage with an attached barn to the
south of Burton Hall. The maps also show a number of outbuildings and field
barns associated with Burton Hall and The White House. With the exception of
fragments of a couple a barns, a byre, a sheep dip and a few lengths of
walling nothing of the post-medieval buildings of Burton survive above ground
level. The main track which approaches from the south west entered Burton Hall
farmyard and exited from the east from where it picked up the line of the
medieval back lane. A grassy track runs from the western side of Burton Hall
through an enclosed field northwards while a hollow track runs from Burton
Hall farmyard north eastwards to the fields beyond. Part of the post-medieval
associated field system can still be traced; this includes a rectangular
enclosure north of the site of Burton Hall which appears to enlarge and
formalise the earlier medieval enclosure here. There is a small stock pen in
the enclosure's north east corner. To the west, on the opposite side of
Cringle Beck, is a sub-rectangular stone-walled enclosure created in the
latter half of the 19th century and imposed on the earlier ridge and furrow.
Similarly a ruined wall overlies the ridge and furrow south of the moat and
appears to replace a hedge boundary between it and the moat. At its eastern
end there are traces of a small stock pen considered to have been associated
with The White House. On the south eastern side of the site of Burton Hall
there is a small paddock or garden which was created in the early years of the
20th century.
A number of features are excluded from the scheduling; these include all
modern walls and fences, all military earthworks and structures, and the
surfaces of all tracks; the ground beneath all these features, however, is
included.

MAP EXTRACT
The site of the monument is shown on the attached map extract.

Source: Historic England

Reasons for Scheduling

Medieval rural settlements in England were marked by great regional diversity
in form, size and type, and the protection of their archaeological remains
needs to take these differences into account. To do this, England has been
divided into three broad Provinces on the basis of each area's distinctive
mixture of nucleated and dispersed settlements. These can be further divided
into sub-Provinces and local regions, possessing characteristics which have
gradually evolved during the past 1500 years or more.
This monument lies in the Cumbria-Solway sub-Province of the Northern and
Western Province, an area characterised by dispersed hamlets and farmsteads,
but with some larger nucleated settlements in well-defined agriculturally
favoured areas, established after the Norman Conquest. Traces of seasonal
settlements, or shielings, dominate the high, wet and windy uplands, where
surrounding communities grazed their livestock during the summer months.
The Eden Valley local region is a rich agricultural lowland ringed by mountain
pastures. It is densely settled with small market towns, villages, hamlets and
isolated farmsteads. Medieval castles and monasteries, a multitude of
earthwork sites and the distinctive mix of Celtic, Scottish, English,
Scandinavian and Norman place-names all testify to the ancient and long
sustained occupation of this important region.

Medieval villages were organised agricultural communities, sited at the centre
of a parish or township, that shared resources such as arable land, meadow and
woodland. Village plans varied enormously, but when they survive as earthworks
their most distinguishing features include roads and minor tracks, platforms
on which stood houses and other buildings such as barns, enclosed crofts and
small enclosed paddocks. They frequently included the parish church within
their boundaries, and as part of the manorial system most villages included
one or more manorial centres which may also survive as visible remains as well
as below ground deposits. In the northern and western province of England
medieval villages occurred infrequently amid areas of otherwise dispersed
settlement and good examples are therefore proportionally infrequent. Thus
their archaeological remains are one of the most important sources for
understanding rural life in the five or more centuries following the Norman
Conquest.
Medieval villages were supported by a communal system of agriculture based on
large, unenclosed open arable fields. These large fields were subdivided into
strips (known as lands) which were allocated to individual tenants. The
cultivation of these strips with heavy ploughs pulled by oxen-teams produced
long, wide ridges, and where it survives the resultant `ridge and furrow' is
the most obvious physical indication of the open field system. Individual
strips or lands were laid out in groups known as furlongs defined by terminal
headlands at the plough turning points and lateral grass banks. Furlongs were
in turn grouped into large open fields. Well-preserved ridge and furrow,
especially in its original context adjacent to village earthworks, is both an
important source of information about medieval agrarian life and a distinctive
contribution to the character of the historic landscape. It is usually now
covered by the hedges or walls of subsequent field enclosures.
Around 6,000 moated sites are known in England. They consist of wide ditches,
often waterfilled, partly or completely enclosing one or more islands of dry
ground on which stood domestic or religious buildings. In some cases the
islands were used for horticulture. The majority of moated sites served as
prestigious aristocratic and seignorial residences with the provision of a
moat intended as a status symbol rather than a practical military defence. The
peak period during which moats were built was between about 1250 and 1350.
They form a significant class of medieval monument and are important for the
understanding of the distribution of wealth and status in the countryside.
Many examples provide conditions favourable to the survival of organic
remains.
A fishpond is an artificially created pool of slow moving freshwater
construced for the purpose of cultivating, breeding and storing fish to
provide a constant and sustainable supply of food. They were maintained by a
water management system which included inlet and outlet channels carrying
water from a river or stream, a series of sluices set into a dam and along the
channels and leats, and an overflow leat which controlled fluctuations in the
water flow and prevented flooding. The tradition of building fishponds began
during the medieval period and peaked in the 12th century, however, most fell
out of use during the post-medieval period. Most fishponds were located close
to villages, manors or monasteries or within parks so that a watch could be
kept on them to prevent poaching. They are important for their associations
with other classes of medieval monuments and in providing evidence of site
economy.
Early post-medieval settlements in this area are generally similar to earlier
medieval settlements, and in the absence of documentary sources precise dating
is often difficult. They frequently occupy the same or an adjacent area to
that previously occupied by a medieval settlement, and in many cases represent
a continuity of use of the medieval site into the post-medieval period. Their
associated field systems are generally characterised by a more formal system
of land division in which enclosed fields were created and superimposed on
areas which were previously farmed as medieval open fields.
Despite some damage to the monument sustained during military training
exercises, a substantial proportion of Burton medieval village, its associated
open field system, the fishpond and moated fishpond complex, and the
post-medieval village of Burton and its associated field system survives well.
It is a good example of a medieval and post-medieval settlement in the Eden
Valley local region and will add greatly to our understanding of the wider
settlement and economy during these periods.

Source: Historic England

Sources

Other
RCHME, Burton Hall; An Archaeological Survey Report, (1998)
RCHME, Burton Hall; An Archaeological Survey Report, (1998)

Source: Historic England

Other nearby scheduled monuments

AncientMonuments.uk is an independent online resource and is not associated with any government department. All government data published here is used under licence. Please do not contact AncientMonuments.uk for any queries related to any individual ancient or schedued monument, planning permission related to scheduled monuments or the scheduling process itself.

AncientMonuments.uk is a Good Stuff website.