Ancient Monuments

History on the Ground

This site is entirely user-supported. See how you can help.

Sweetworthy deserted medieval settlement

A Scheduled Monument in Luccombe, Somerset

Approximate Location Map
Large Map »
Street or Overhead View
Contributor Photos »

If Google Street View is available, the image is from the best available vantage point looking, if possible, towards the location of the monument. Where it is not available, the satellite view is shown instead.

Coordinates

Latitude: 51.1701 / 51°10'12"N

Longitude: -3.5924 / 3°35'32"W

OS Eastings: 288766.928509

OS Northings: 142409.091644

OS Grid: SS887424

Mapcode National: GBR LC.6HQX

Mapcode Global: VH5K2.PV6D

Entry Name: Sweetworthy deserted medieval settlement

Scheduled Date: 13 July 1994

Source: Historic England

Source ID: 1008469

English Heritage Legacy ID: 24027

County: Somerset

Civil Parish: Luccombe

Traditional County: Somerset

Lieutenancy Area (Ceremonial County): Somerset

Details

The monument includes a deserted medieval settlement on the lower northern
slopes of Dunkery Hill.
The site consists of earthwork remains of building footings, a sub-rectangular
enclosure and trackways, with a square enclosure a short way uphill.
The settlement was formed of some eleven dispersed buildings, of which perhaps
three or four were houses, the rest being barns and other ancillary
structures. Apart from a yard and group of small buildings associated with the
sub-rectangular enclosure, the settlement is open in layout.
The remains lie on an east-west line across a north west facing slope, so that
the eastern part is higher. The western part runs lower into a small, shallow
valley, which is bounded by a stream gully running north, and a shorter
tributary gully cutting back into the middle of the site. One feature lies on
the far side of the western gully, which otherwise forms a natural boundary to
the settlement. On the east, the features end on a third stream.
The two sides of the site - the valley and the higher ground - were linked by
an east-west hollow trackway running above the short tributary gully. From the
mid-point of the trackway another hollow way ran up out of the settlement to
the south, leading onto what is now moorland. The junction of these
hollow ways, which was above the head of the gully, has been lost through
erosion. Many of the buildings were footed into 'stances', level terraces cut
back into the hillside, with a space around the end of the building. Stances
and hollows also occur without traces of building footings, and these would
have supported less substantial timber buildings. In most cases the building
and its stance are set end-on into the slope, facilitating level and sheltered
access to the side of the building.
The upper area of the site lies on a natural shelf or terrace c.45m deep. The
most prominent feature, on its outer edge, is a sub-rectangular enclosure,
from each end of which wall-banks run, to the head of the stream on the east,
and the top of the tributary gully on the west, enclosing the outer side of
the terrace. From the southern side of the enclosure a wall-bank partially
divides the area in two. The upper side of the terrace is delimited by a scarp
along which a more recent track and hedge-bank run. The eastern part forms a
yarded area with a cluster of buildings, associated with the enclosure. The
wall-bank running from the west of the enclosure forms the outside of the
hollow track leading toward the lower part of the site. The western area of
the terrace ends on the uphill hollow way. Beyond this, the terrace curves
away to the south west, around the head of the small valley and above the
lower part of the settlement, which continues in an east-west line along the
shallow slope below. The east-west hollow trackway turns down toward the site
of a lower building by the side of the western stream gully. Below this, the
valley closes to a point at the junction of the tributary gully with the
western gully.
On the upper eastern part of the site, the large sub-rectangular enclosure
lies ENE-WSW on the outer edge of the terrace. It is 33m by 10m with slightly
curving sides of a bank or lynchet c.0.5m high, and a hollowed interior. It
has an entrance in the centre of the southern side to the yarded area on its
south east, perhaps a smaller one on the east, and what may be a small
entrance on the west end onto the hollow trackway. The function of this
enclosure is unclear. If it were the footings of a timber building it would
have been of unusual size and importance.
To the south east of the enclosure the yarded area is divided from the rest of
the settlement by the wall-bank running from the front side of the enclosure,
so that the enclosure entrance opens to the yarded side. The wall-bank from
the east end of the enclosure runs inwards diagonally up to a stream. The
upper side of the area may have been defined by a scarp along the inside edge
of the terrace. Within this area are the hollows of a building opposite the
enclosure, 9m by 6m, with an upright stone slab set inside the entrance, and
two or three smaller structures c.5m by 3m, all in alignment with the
enclosure. A second building hollow with footings, 9m by 6m, is attached to
the inside of the diagonal bank near the enclosure. Between this and the
enclosure is a gap in the wall bank, providing access from the yarded area to
the falling ground on the north, and the attached building also has its
entrance to this side of the wall bank.
On the other side of the dividing wall-bank, the western area of the terrace
is defined by the trackway running west from the enclosure and the hollow way
running south towards the higher ground. This area contains a building footing
12m by 6m in a stance, end-on to the slope, with an entrance to the
north west, and there are two smaller building footings 8m by 4m on the west
end of the enclosure, either side of the track running from it. The track runs
around the end of the southern building between it and the enclosure and opens
out into this area. The northern building on the other side of the track has
an opening to the trackway. It is external to the wall bank along the terrace,
and attached to the end of the enclosure; it appears to be primary to or
overlie the end wall of the enclosure, suggesting a closely related
construction and function. It is the only building with stone footings visible
rather than banks. The main building on this part of the terrace was probably
a house, and the southern of the smaller buildings an associated barn. The
trackway today runs to a 3m deep gully. However, its route is continued the
other side of the gully by a curving hollow leading to the lower part of the
small valley. The hollow track running uphill to the south also runs into the
head of the stream gully, and it is clear that these three trackways
originally met at a junction which has been disturbed by erosion.
All fences are excluded from the scheduling although the ground beneath them
is included.

MAP EXTRACT
The site of the monument is shown on the attached map extract.

Source: Historic England

Reasons for Scheduling

The village, comprising a small group of houses, gardens, yards, streets,
paddocks, often with a green, a manor and a church, and with a community
devoted primarily to agriculture, was a significant component of the rural
landscape in most areas of medieval England, much as it is today. Villages
provided some services to the local community and acted as the main focal
point of ecclesiastical, and often of manorial, administration within each
parish. Although the sites of many of these villages have been occupied
continuously down to the present day, many others declined in size or were
abandoned throughout the medieval and post-medieval periods, particularly
during the 14th and 15th centuries. As a result over 2000 deserted medieval
villages are recorded nationally. The reasons for desertion were varied but
often reflected declining economic viability, changes in land use such as
enclosure or emparkment, or population fluctuations as a result of widespread
epidemics such as the Black Death. As a consequence of their abandonment
these villages are frequently undisturbed by later occupation and contain
well-preserved archaeological deposits. Because they are a common and
long-lived monument type in most parts of England, they provide important
information on the diversity of medieval settlement patterns and farming
economy between the regions and through time.

The deserted site at Sweetworthy survives as a good example of its class, and
together with Bagley nearby constitutes one of the most important areas of
medieval remains in west Somerset. Its association with prehistoric settlement
sites is of interest, as archaeological remains relating to the full span of
settlement from prehistory to the medieval period are present.

Source: Historic England

Other nearby scheduled monuments

AncientMonuments.uk is an independent online resource and is not associated with any government department. All government data published here is used under licence. Please do not contact AncientMonuments.uk for any queries related to any individual ancient or schedued monument, planning permission related to scheduled monuments or the scheduling process itself.

AncientMonuments.uk is a Good Stuff website.