Ancient Monuments

History on the Ground

This site is entirely user-supported. See how you can help.

World War II caisson, West Knock sandbank, Shoebury Ness

A Scheduled Monument in West Shoebury, Southend-on-Sea

Approximate Location Map
Large Map »
Street or Overhead View
Contributor Photos »

If Google Street View is available, the image is from the best available vantage point looking, if possible, towards the location of the monument. Where it is not available, the satellite view is shown instead.

Coordinates

Latitude: 51.5082 / 51°30'29"N

Longitude: 0.7657 / 0°45'56"E

OS Eastings: 592027.63037

OS Northings: 182433.212364

OS Grid: TQ920824

Mapcode National: GBR RR9.GD2

Mapcode Global: VHKHV.7C55

Entry Name: World War II caisson, West Knock sandbank, Shoebury Ness

Scheduled Date: 24 February 2004

Source: Historic England

Source ID: 1021090

English Heritage Legacy ID: 35501

County: Southend-on-Sea

Electoral Ward/Division: West Shoebury

Built-Up Area: Southend-on-Sea

Traditional County: Essex

Lieutenancy Area (Ceremonial County): Essex

Church of England Parish: South Shoebury St Andrew with St Peter

Church of England Diocese: Chelmsford

Details

The monument includes a Phoenix caisson, its back broken, lying on West Knock
sandbank in the Thames Estuary some 1.8km SSW off the point at Shoebury Ness.
The caisson lies in two sections, end to end, orientated north west-south
east. The larger is approximately 35m long; the smaller 26m. The width of both
sections is about 9.75m and height up to 6m. The exact sizes are difficult to
confirm as both sections are listing longitudinally, partially sunken into the
sandbank, and surrounded by a `moat' of deep water caused by tidal scouring.
It is constructed of a steel framework and concrete base and walls about 0.3m
thick. The sections are hollow and open to the sky, sea water periodically
inundating part of each section according to the state of the tide.
Internally, it is divided by cross-members into square cells, 18 in all and
two-abreast for the full length of the structure.

According to an eye witness, Royal Navy signalman Ian Gordon, who was on
board the caisson when it was being towed from Immingham on the Humber en
route to Southsea, it sprang a leak so was brought into the Thames Estuary
and allowed to sink.

The following items are excluded from the scheduling: all fixtures and
fittings relating to the modern shipping navigation light and tower, the
platform on which it stands, access walkways and ladders, and any electrical
cabling and additional mooring bollards. The caisson structure beneath them,
or to which they are attached is, however, included.

MAP EXTRACT
The site of the monument is shown on the attached map extract.

Source: Historic England

Reasons for Scheduling

D-Day, June 6th 1944, is one of the most significant dates in modern
history, defining the start of the final phase of World War II in Europe.
After two to three years of preparations, the assault phase of `Operation
Overlord' - codenamed Neptune - lasted for little over three weeks and by
30 June had landed over 850,000 men on the invasion beachheads, together
with nearly 150,000 vehicles and 570,000 tons of supplies.
Much of the success of Overlord was due to the presence of an artificial
harbour (known as a `Mulberry' harbour) at Arromanches, built in sections (and
different components generally at separate sites) and towed across the channel
for the disembarkation of troops and landing of supplies. Although one other
harbour failed, the successful one at Arromanches was significant in providing
the tactical advantage of surprise, and the logistical advantage of not having
to land on a defended shore and at the mercy of the weather. As Prime Minister
Churchill said, these harbours were `a principal part of the great plan', and
were decisive in the first days of the invasion.
Many sites were involved in the harbours' construction, stretching at least
from Southampton, via south coast ports and London, to the North East. These
sites were chosen and, in some cases, designed for the manufacture of either:
the `phoenix' caissons (fully submerged breakwaters made of cement; the
largest was 60,447 tons) and bombardons (partially submerged steel
breakwaters; up to 1000 tons) which made up the outer harbour; or the
pierheads (`spuds'), floating piers (`whales', with their steel-spanned
roadways), and the pontoons (`beetles', some of steel, some of concrete) that
supported them. These construction sites were located either in largely
unmodified dry docks or slipways, or in excavated basins or prepared beaches.
Beach construction sites are the most visible and may retain construction
platforms, slipways and winch house foundations. A small number of excavated
basins are also known. Some of the components also survive, mostly at sea,
having sunk while on tow, but occasionally on land where they were left as
surplus to requirements.
Although in military archaeology fixed defences will often survive better than
materiel representing the mobile offensive, sufficient of the preparations for
D-Day in England remains to give an impression of the scale of the Operation,
and the variety of the specific tasks involved. All sites where surviving
remains provide an impression of the scale and nature of construction work,
including construction sites and surviving components, will be considered of
national importance.

The Shoebury Ness caisson is a Type C1, of which 17 were constructed out of
a total of 212 caissons of all types built. These huge concrete structures
formed part of a system of temporary `Mulberry' harbours built to provide
sheltered mooring close to the shallow shelving beaches of Normandy,
facilitating the rapid re-supply of the invading D-Day forces in June 1944.
The historic significance of this monument can best be appreciated by
understanding a little of how it was, or would have been, used as part of a
temporary harbour works following the D-Day landings in 1944.
Part of the invasion strategy was to create beachheads where the enemy least
expected attack and offered less resistance. The lessons learnt after the
disastrous failure at Dieppe in August 1942 ruled out a direct frontal assault
on any French north coast port, such as Le Havre and Cherbourg. These were
heavily fortified against such an eventuality and would have resulted in heavy
Allied casualties. A period of complex deception, called Operation
`FORTITUDE', was intended to fool the Germans into thinking the invasion
would be focused where the sea crossing was at its narrowest at the Pas de
Calais.

Operation `OVERLORD', the plan to eventually liberate occupied Europe
and subdue Germany, began with the invasion of the eastern flank of the
Cotentin peninsula in Normandy, at five shallow sandy beaches codenamed
`Utah', `Omaha', `Gold', `Juno' and `Sword'. The key to this, involving the
largest invasion force in history, was for the Allies to take their own
temporary harbours with them - floated over in sections and assembled just off
shore. However, these harbours would become largely redundant following the
eventual capture of more established port facilities elsewhere.

There were four major components to Mulberry harbours. The first component
was formed of 60 cement-filled `blockships', sailed across the Channel under
their own steam then, when in the correct location, lined up bow to stern and
scuttled, creating secondary or `Gooseberry' breakwaters for the harbour site.
The second component involved 150 massive `Phoenix' hollow concrete caissons
of various sizes, each towed by a tug. When in their correct location within
the ring of Gooseberries, flood valves were opened and the caisson settled on
the bottom leaving approximately two-thirds of each structure above the water
to form an inner breakwater. The third component comprised several floating
wharves or `Spuds' anchored within the harbour perimeter thus formed, and able
to rise up and down according to the state of the tide, each between four huge
steel pylon legs with splayed feet secured to the sea bed. The fourth
component consisted of floating road bridges connecting the Spud wharves with
the land, composed of steel and concrete pontoons or `Beetles' that supporting
sections of roadway. An additional element was positioned farther out to sea
in the form of a floating breakwater constructed of hollow tubes or
`Bombardons' designed to reduce the height of incoming waves. This whole
infrastructure was on a massive scale, designed to cope with large numbers of
troop transport and supply ships. Each harbour was to extend along the shore
about 3.5km and reach out into the water by 1.75km.

Two Mulberry harbours were started, one in the British sector on `Gold' beach
at Arromanches; the other farther west in the American Sector on `Omaha'
beach. After towing the sections across the Channel, assembly started on
the 9th June and by the 18th two great arcs of caissons were in place. The
following day, however, a very heavy storm, lasting three days started,
entirely wrecking the incomplete harbour on Omaha and severely damaging the
one on Gold. What could be salvaged from Omaha was transferred to the British,
so the capture of Cherbourg with its port became an urgent task for the
Americans.

Mulberry harbours were originally designed to endure for 100 days; nearly
sixty years later some thirty great Phoenix caissons remain in position in the
Arromanches `temporary' harbour wall. Apart from the Shoebury Ness example,
at least three other caissons remain in British waters, having never made
it over the Channel. Recorded examples lie within English waters at two
locations: two units at Castletown Pier, Portland Harbour, Dorset; and one
unit in Langstone Harbour, near Portsmouth.

The Shoebury Ness caisson is therefore a rare surviving example, which
chanced to be stranded in British waters rather than reach its intended
destination. It reflects an extraordinary engineering project designed to
facilitate perhaps the most significant event of World War II - the D-Day
counter- invasion and liberation of Continental Europe - and it remains a high
visible symbol of this critical point in the history of the war.

Source: Historic England

Other nearby scheduled monuments

AncientMonuments.uk is an independent online resource and is not associated with any government department. All government data published here is used under licence. Please do not contact AncientMonuments.uk for any queries related to any individual ancient or schedued monument, planning permission related to scheduled monuments or the scheduling process itself.

AncientMonuments.uk is a Good Stuff website.