Details

The monument includes the earthwork and buried remains of a motte and bailey
castle, partly formed from an earlier ringwork castle, the associated remains
of a medieval village and ridge and furrow cultivation, situated on a tongue
of land which extends into a lower lying former marshy area from the slightly
higher ground to the east. At the western end of this peninsula is the site of
the castle. It lies 600m north east of the motte and bailey castle at Lydham,
which is the subject of a separate scheduling.

Documentary evidence indicates that More orginally lay within the manor of
Lydham, and that in the 12th century, probably during the reign of Henry I
(1100-1135), it became a separate manor. During Henry's reign it is also
recorded that the Lord of More, a constable of the king's army, was required
to command 200 foot soldiers, while carrying the royal standard, whenever the
king crossed into Wales in time of war. A document of 1215 mentions a castle
at Moretoin, which is thought to refer to the castle at More, and in 1368 a
licence was granted to Hugh Cheney allowing him to celebrate Mass in the
oratory (private chapel) at his mansion house here.

A small-scale archaeological excavation undertaken in 1959 demonstrated that
the castle was initially a ringwork, a circular area occupied by buildings,
surrounded by a bank and an external ditch, probably constructed in the late
11th century. A little later, probably early in the 12th century, the enclosed
circular area was filled in and heightened to form the motte. This flat-topped
mound measures approximately 34m at its base and 21m across the top, and
stands up to 2.1m high. It is surrounded by a shallow ditch about 8m wide,
which is wet in places, and by an external bank up to 7m wide and 0.6m high.
Access onto the motte is via a 5m wide causeway, which crosses the south
eastern part of the ditch.

To the north east of the motte, running the length of the peninsula, lie a
succession of banked and ditched enclosures. The two principal rectangular
enclosures nearest the motte are the inner and outer baileys to the castle.
The internal area of inner bailey (the one closest to the motte) is
approximately 0.4ha and the internal area of outer bailey is about 0.6ha. The
ditches which define the baileys are partially waterlogged, while in other
places they have been largely infilled. Material excavated from the ditches
was used to create internal banks, which survive most notably as earthworks at
the south western and north eastern parts of the outer bailey.

The ditch separating the baileys was bridged by a causeway, about 7m wide.
Within the inner bailey, levelled and raised areas indicate the positions of
former buildings, partly cut by later drainage ditches. Blocks of stone from
demolished and collapsed buildings lie embedded in the ground. In 1959 the
remains of at least one substantial stone-built structure was uncovered,
together with sherds of pottery.

To the north east of the causeway, which crosses the ditch between the two
baileys, are the remains of a former access road to the castle. It crosses the
outer bailey and continues as a hollow way firstly in a north easterly
direction and then in a northerly direction for about 220m where it joins the
modern road. The hollow way was created by the volume of the passing taffic,
and is defined by earthen banks between 3m and 5m wide and up to 0.4m high.
Part of the south eastern side of the hollow way has been cut by a later
drainage ditch. The bank that delimits this side of the hollow way also
defines one edge of a sub-rectangular enclosure, approximately 0.6ha
internally, which lies immediately north east of the outer bailey. This
enclosure was a toft forming part of the medieval village of More. A toft
contained a series of crofts (peasant houses with yards and gardens) and
associated paddocks.

The village was a nucleated settlement, with the present hamlet centred around
the Church of St Peter. The church dates to the 13th century, altered in 1640,
and was rebuilt and extended in the 19th century. The present settlement also
consists of several timber-framed farmhouses of 16th and 17th century date,
together with other domestic and agricultural buildings of later date. These
buildings are not included in the scheduling. Much of the peninsula to the
west of the present hamlet, including parts of the castle and the medieval
settlement remains, are overlain with ridge and furrow indicating that when
the area ceased to be occupied it was taken into arable cultivation. This has
led to the partial modifition of the castle and village earthworks. The north
western extent of this field system is marked by a very long-established field
boundary, the northern end of which runs over the northern part of the bank
defining the former hollow way. This field boundary is included in the
scheduling to preserve the relationship between it, the bank alongside the
road, and the ridge and furrow cultivation remains.

All fence and gate posts, animal feed containers and utility poles are
excluded from then scheduling, although the ground beneath all these features
is included.

MAP EXTRACT
The site of the monument is shown on the attached map extract.

Source: Historic England

Reasons for Scheduling

Motte and bailey castles are medieval fortifications introduced into Britain
by the Normans. They comprised a large conical mound of earth or rubble, the
motte, surmounted by a palisade and a stone or timber tower. In a majority of
examples an embanked enclosure containing additional buildings, the bailey,
adjoined the motte. Motte castles and motte-and-bailey castles acted as
garrison forts during offensive military operations, as strongholds, and, in
many cases, as aristocratic residences and as centres of local or royal
administration. Built in towns, villages and open countryside, motte and
bailey castles generally occupied strategic positions dominating their
immediate locality and, as a result, are the most visually impressive
monuments of the early post-Conquest period surviving in the modern landscape.
Over 600 motte castles or motte-and-bailey castles are recorded nationally,
with examples known from most regions. As one of a restricted range of
recognised early post-Conquest monuments, they are particularly important for
the study of Norman Britain and the development of the feudal system. Although
many were occupied for only a short period of time, motte castles continued to
be built and occupied from the 11th to the 13th centuries, after which they
were superseded by other types of castle.

The motte and bailey castle at More is a well-preserved example of this class
of monument, incorporating the remains of an earlier ringwork castle. The site
therefore provides significant evidence for the changing design and functional
roles of castles in this area during the early Middle Ages. The small-scale
archaeological excavation has helped to demonstrate the nature, extent and the
date of the structural remains existing here. These buildings, together with
the associated artefacts and organic remains, will provide valuable evidence
about the activities and lifestyle of the inhabitants. Documentary references
provide valuable information about the status of its occupants and the
strategic importance of the castle during the early Middle Ages. The close
proximity of the motte and bailey castle at Lydham would suggest that both
these castles were associated in some way.

The importance of the castle at More is further enhanced by its direct
association with the adjacent medieval settlement. Despite modification of
parts of this area from later cultivation, extensive structural remains are
expected to survive. The buildings, the associated artefacts and the organic
remains will, in relation to those at the castle, provide considerable
evidence for the economic basis and the organisation and social structure of
the medieval community at More.

The use of this area for cultivation in the later Middle Ages, following the
abandonment of the castle and the part of the settlement immediately adjacent
to it, demonstrates the changing nature of land holding patterns and the
economic needs of the community at this time.

Source: Historic England

Sources

Books and journals
Higham, R, Barker, P, Timber Castles, (1992), 232-33
Renn, D, Norman Castles in Britain, (1973), 249
Rowley, R T, The Shropshire Landscape, (1972), 69,86
Watson, M, Musson, C, Shropshire from the Air. Man and the Landscape, (1993), 63
Hope-Taylor, B, 'Antiquity' in Reviews, , Vol. 34, (1960), 229
Webster, G, 'West Midlands Archaeological News Sheet' in , , Vol. 2, (1959), 7
Weyman, H T, 'Transactions of the Shropshire Archaeological Society 1925-26' in Shropshire MPs - Memoirs, , Vol. 43, (1926), 185

Source: Historic England